What Are the Risks When Sourcing From China?

The probability of supply chain disruptions is significantly higher than the global average, with policy compliance risks bearing the brunt. Data from China’s General Administration of Customs in 2023 shows that the number of batches of imported goods blocked due to technical trade measures (TBT) increased by 17.3% year-on-year, involving a value of over 8 billion US dollars. A European infant and toddler products supplier failed to update the GB 31701-2015 children’s clothing safety standard in a timely manner, resulting in the return of the entire container of goods at Ningbo Port, causing a direct loss of 350,000 US dollars. Environmental protection regulations are equally strict. After 13 provinces in the Yangtze River Basin implemented stricter wastewater discharge standards in 2022, 25% of electroplating plants in the Pearl River Delta were forced to suspend production as they failed to meet the new regulation of COD≤50mg/L, causing the downstream delivery delay rate to rise by 32%.

Quality fluctuations pose a substantial threat. According to the spot-check data of the State Administration for Market Regulation in 2023, the product qualification rate of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises was only 78.5%. Key indicators included that the standard deviation of the MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) of electronic components was ±3000 hours, and the dimensional tolerance deviation rate of mechanical parts exceeded 8%. A North American smart home brand once experienced a lithium battery thermal runaway incident. Tracing the source, it was found that the supplier privately changed the energy density parameters of the battery cells (from the claimed 260Wh/kg to 215Wh/kg), which eventually triggered a product recall worth 4.5 million US dollars. Industry research shows that the hidden costs incurred by purchasers due to quality claims account for approximately 12% to 18% of the total order value.

Uncontrollable factors in logistics have significantly prolonged the delivery cycle. Statistics from the Shanghai Shipping Exchange show that the average demurred rate at major Chinese ports was 14.5% in 2023, with the peak waiting time at Yantian Port reaching as long as 9.3 days. After the implementation of RCEP, the complexity of cross-border logistics has increased. The annual increase in customs clearance delays caused by incorrect HS code classification has reached 26%, especially for multi-material composite products (such as power tools containing metal/plastic components), the classification error rate is as high as 43%. During the epidemic lockdown in Kunshan in 2022, the air freight rate for electronic products soared to $9.2 per kilogram, which was 320% of the normal price. The disruption of the supply chain directly led to a shortage loss of over 18 million euros for a certain European retailer during the peak season.

EJET Procurement increase your profits with value added services

Financial and payment risks continue to amplify in the multi-level supply network. The commercial paper default data of the People’s Bank of China shows that the overdue rate of commercial bills of small and medium-sized manufacturing enterprises rose to 15.7% in 2023, among which the probability of bad debts for orders with a payment period exceeding 120 days increased by 11 percentage points. Common traps in sourcing from china include: The Yiwu Small Commodities Market once exposed a case where a trading company defrauded by using 30% advance payment, with the involved amount reaching 26 million yuan. A certain mold factory in Dongguan defrauded 70% of the balance payment by modifying the bank slip through PS. A more concealed risk lies in the financial leverage ratio of suppliers. The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau disclosed that the average asset-liability ratio of the manufacturing industry has reached 63%, far exceeding the healthy threshold of 50%.

Intellectual property leakage is particularly fatal in innovation-intensive industries. The 2023 White Paper on Intellectual Property Rights of Chinese Courts shows that the number of foreign-related technology contract disputes has increased by 31.8% year-on-year, and the median amount of compensation for industrial design theft has reached 480,000 US dollars. A typical example is a certain German robotic arm enterprise. The core components produced by its entrusted contract manufacturer were counterfeited and flooded the market at 60% of the price three months later. The precision parameter error was expanded from ±0.01mm to ±0.05mm. What is even more serious is the supply chain vulnerability. It was once exposed that an engineer from an electronics factory in Shenzhen stole the firmware code of a Bluetooth module and sold it through a gray channel, causing the original enterprise to lose about 3.8 million US dollars in patent licensing fees.

The compliance black hole continues to expand against the backdrop of strengthened regulation. The newly implemented Export Control Law has raised the upper limit of fines for violations to 20 times the transaction amount. In 2023, three European enterprises have been fined 240 million yuan for illegally transferring CNC machine tools (control code: 84571000). The pilot data of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) shows that the embodied carbon intensity of China’s exported steel products has reached 2.1 tons of CO2/t, far exceeding the EU benchmark of 1.3 tons of CO2/t, and may increase the tariff cost by 23% in the future. The cumulative effect of these risk factors makes the procurement behavior lacking local professional support a high-cost game.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top
Scroll to Top